Peer Review reports
From: One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugene Demidenko |
| 7 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy |
| 17 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Lunt |
| 26 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
| 7 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugene Demidenko |
| 12 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
| 22 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy |
| 8 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
| 18 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.