Peer Review reports
From: Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Morris |
| 15 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Thomas |
| 16 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Morris |
| 6 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Morris |
| 28 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Thomas |
| 9 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Jul 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Thomas |
| 28 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 15 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 15 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 25 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 25 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Sep 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Sep 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108 |
You can find further information about peer review here.