Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Patten |
| 10 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harvey Whiteford |
| 12 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harvey Whiteford |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 25 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 25 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 26 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 26 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-93 |
You can find further information about peer review here.