Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 3 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Joyce Elsinga |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 14 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leo P. ten Kate |
| 30 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew E. Czeizel |
| 3 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Joyce Elsinga |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 3 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Joyce Elsinga |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 3 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 15 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leo P. ten Kate |
| 18 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew E. Czeizel |
| 7 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Joyce Elsinga |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 7 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 9 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leo P. ten Kate |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jul 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jul 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-7-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.