Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Acceptability and outcomes of the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement- patients' and care givers' perspectives

Original Submission
30 Jul 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Catto-Smith
27 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Anis
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Anis
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Anis
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Catto-Smith
9 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Anis
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Muhammad Anis
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Nov 2006 Editorially accepted
24 Nov 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-6-37

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page