Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Msall |
11 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muideen Bakare |
19 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Pasnak |
21 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Forns |
20 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gwendoline Quetoline Kandawasvika |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
31 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Pasnak |
6 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muideen Bakare |
22 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Msall |
10 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Forns |
27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gwendoline Quetoline Kandawasvika |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muideen Bakare |
22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Msall |
23 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gwendoline Quetoline Kandawasvika |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
23 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-12-147 |
You can find further information about peer review here.