Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 5 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Naim Khan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Lindsay |
| 5 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jens Fuglsang |
| 15 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Naim Khan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jens Fuglsang |
| 22 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - K Joseph |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 2 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - K Joseph |
| 4 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jens Fuglsang |
| 6 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Naim Khan |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Naim Khan |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 29 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Naim Khan |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 29 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Feb 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Feb 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-10-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.