Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Dan Kaye |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lilian Teddy Mselle |
10 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - THECLA KOHI |
21 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Dan Kaye |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lilian Teddy Mselle |
7 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - THECLA KOHI |
17 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Dan Kaye |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lilian Teddy Mselle |
7 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Dan Kaye |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
5 Dec 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-13-229 |
You can find further information about peer review here.