Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine McCourt |
10 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Cheyne |
23 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund |
24 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Tracy |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Tracy |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund |
19 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine McCourt |
8 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Tracy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Tracy |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
3 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Tracy |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Tracy |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jan 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Jan 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-46 |
You can find further information about peer review here.