Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 16 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Leask |
| 6 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Kidd |
| 8 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Deidi Strickland Bergestuen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Deidi Strickland Bergestuen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Kidd |
| 10 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Leask |
| 22 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Deidi Strickland Bergestuen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 22 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.