Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Saskia Rademakers |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pierre Sonveaux |
| 21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Minchinton |
| 22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Saskia Rademakers |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pierre Sonveaux |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Saskia Rademakers |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Saskia Rademakers |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-167 |
You can find further information about peer review here.