Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathleen Ignatoski |
1 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Samantha Larkin |
5 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosita Winkler |
13 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - srikala sridhar |
14 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Caterina Peraldo-Neia |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosita Winkler |
4 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Samantha Larkin |
4 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - srikala sridhar |
19 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Caterina Peraldo-Neia |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Caterina Peraldo-Neia |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
24 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Caterina Peraldo-Neia |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
25 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.