Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Gallie |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Cobrinik |
| 2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Dyer |
| 24 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erik Vassella |
| 21 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Gallie |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erik Vassella |
| 11 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Cobrinik |
| 16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Gallie |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Cobrinik |
| 11 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Brenda Gallie |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 15 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 15 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-69 |
You can find further information about peer review here.