Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lone Ross |
11 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohsen Asadi-Lari |
11 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw |
18 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Judith Booij |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lone Ross |
1 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
22 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Judith Booij |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
7 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lone Ross |
14 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Judith Booij |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
19 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-13-203 |
You can find further information about peer review here.