Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
24 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johannes Huelsenbeck |
24 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Pajonk |
31 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Zips |
3 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Brunner |
21 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Chalmers |
17 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Stephenson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
9 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Zips |
16 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johannes Huelsenbeck |
24 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Chalmers |
27 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Brunner |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
20 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Stephenson |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
6 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-424 |
You can find further information about peer review here.