Peer Review reports
From: The validity of the Type D construct and its assessment in Taiwan
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chia-Ying Weng |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 20 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chia-Ying Weng |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Svein Bergvik |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gesine Grande |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Young-Hoon Ko |
| 22 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chia-Ying Weng |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 22 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Svein Bergvik |
| 8 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gesine Grande |
| 14 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Chia-Ying Weng |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gesine Grande |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-13-46 |
You can find further information about peer review here.