Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Storch |
| 29 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Mataix-Cols |
| 24 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Horton |
| 24 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Delorme |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Mataix-Cols |
| 13 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Horton |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 8 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Delorme |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Delorme |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 14 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Delorme |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 14 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Jan 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Jan 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-6-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.