Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dag Bruusgaard |
| 11 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Els Clays |
| 24 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joost van der Gulden |
| 21 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hélène Sandmark |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joost van der Gulden |
| 15 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dag Bruusgaard |
| 1 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hélène Sandmark |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hélène Sandmark |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hélène Sandmark |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-210 |
You can find further information about peer review here.