Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Armando Soto-Rojas |
23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luc Martens |
9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Constantine Oulis |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Armando Soto-Rojas |
3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luc Martens |
7 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Constantine Oulis |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Constantine Oulis |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-100 |
You can find further information about peer review here.