Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Hayes |
| 16 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Dodd |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Eyles |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Dodd |
| 8 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Hayes |
| 3 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Eyles |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Frankel |
| 21 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Eyles |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Frankel |
| 2 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Eyles |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 2 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 8 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Eyles |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 8 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 15 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Eyles |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 15 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-666 |
You can find further information about peer review here.