Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Syed Shahzad Hasan |
9 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chenglong Liu |
19 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Marie Chomat |
14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Syed Shahzad Hasan |
9 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Marie Chomat |
15 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
16 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
17 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
8 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
8 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
9 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Betty Namuddu |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
9 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
10 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-855 |
You can find further information about peer review here.