Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Damery |
27 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
31 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter |
2 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Damery |
16 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter |
19 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
2 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
30 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlotte Price |
4 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlotte Price |
23 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
19 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
17 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-248 |
You can find further information about peer review here.