Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Bent-Martin Eliassen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tore Tynes |
6 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlotte Jeppesen |
11 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Elkeles |
15 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Bent-Martin Eliassen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Elkeles |
28 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tore Tynes |
30 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlotte Jeppesen |
8 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Bent-Martin Eliassen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Bent-Martin Eliassen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
20 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
29 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-522 |
You can find further information about peer review here.