Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toni Liechty |
20 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young |
28 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush |
7 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jonathan Mond |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young |
10 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush |
28 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jonathan Mond |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young |
14 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush |
8 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petra Graham |
16 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jonathan Mond |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petra Graham |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
25 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-920 |
You can find further information about peer review here.