Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Amber Louie |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Töres Theorell |
9 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cameron Stark |
10 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gustavo Turecki |
31 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Aleck Ostry |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gustavo Turecki |
15 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cameron Stark |
3 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Aleck Ostry |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
13 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Aleck Ostry |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
27 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-77 |
You can find further information about peer review here.