Peer Review reports
From: Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Goos |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Goos |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Goos |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 12 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donato Francesco Altomare |
| 12 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - jean jacques tuech |
| 3 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Goos |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donato Francesco Altomare |
| 16 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Goos |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 16 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-13-45 |
You can find further information about peer review here.