Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The efficacy of risk scores for predicting abdominal wound dehiscence: a case-controlled validation study

Original Submission
13 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabrielle van Ramshorst
7 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabrielle van Ramshorst
16 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 7
16 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
21 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabrielle van Ramshorst
15 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jakub Kenig
Resubmission - Version 8
15 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
27 Aug 2014 Editorially accepted
2 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-14-65

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page