Peer Review reports
From: The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Nov 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Dec 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donna Caniano |
2 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muhammed Ashraf Memon |
5 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Massimo Chiarugi |
24 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthias Johannes Kraemer |
18 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Alun Jones |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muhammed Ashraf Memon |
21 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Massimo Chiarugi |
28 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donna Caniano |
2 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Alun Jones |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Alun Jones |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Alun Jones |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
10 Aug 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Aug 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-7-17 |
You can find further information about peer review here.