Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Holland |
16 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Knut Magne Augestad |
23 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Locatis |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Holland |
6 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Knut Magne Augestad |
12 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Locatis |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Locatis |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Locatis |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Locatis |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Locatis |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.