Peer Review reports
From: The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pierre Durieux |
23 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou |
27 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pierre Durieux |
31 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou |
11 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
4 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.