Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Grace John-Stewart |
3 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippe Msellati |
23 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nigel Rollins |
8 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jose Ramos |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
29 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kwasi Torpey |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kwasi Torpey |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippe Msellati |
8 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nigel Rollins |
14 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kwasi Torpey |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kwasi Torpey |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.