Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn De Coster |
15 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jay Brophy |
2 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Alter |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn De Coster |
28 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jay Brophy |
23 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Alter |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jay Brophy |
27 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Alter |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Alter |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
18 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Alter |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
5 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.