Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Is the Kaiser Permanente model superior in terms of clinical integration?: a comparative study of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California and the Danish healthcare system

Original Submission
22 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingvar Karlberg
10 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nick Goodwin
2 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingvar Karlberg
9 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
8 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-91

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page