Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
29 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anita Kothari |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Henry |
17 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Kinchin |
11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anita Kothari |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Kinchin |
25 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Henry |
17 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anita Kothari |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anita Kothari |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
12 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anita Kothari |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
17 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anita Kothari |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
17 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
18 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-198 |
You can find further information about peer review here.