Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jim whedon |
5 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Henry Mankin |
16 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan-Ping Yang |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
24 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jim whedon |
3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Henry Mankin |
16 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan-Ping Yang |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
28 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan-Ping Yang |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
26 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan-Ping Yang |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
1 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan-Ping Yang |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
1 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
7 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan-Ping Yang |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
7 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
22 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-230 |
You can find further information about peer review here.