Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Post |
| 10 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sjenny Winters |
| 19 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michelle Hendriks |
| 1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Davies |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Davies |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sjenny Winters |
| 11 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michelle Hendriks |
| 23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Davies |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Davies |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-334 |
You can find further information about peer review here.