Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
1 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas O'Dowd |
6 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Murphy |
29 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingmar Schäfer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
29 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingmar Schäfer |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas O'Dowd |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
3 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Apr 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-89 |
You can find further information about peer review here.