Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
10 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ton Bakker |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ton Bakker |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ton Bakker |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miranda Mugford |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
2 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ton Bakker |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
2 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
23 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ton Bakker |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
23 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
19 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ton Bakker |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
19 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
23 Aug 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-370 |
You can find further information about peer review here.