Peer Review reports
From: Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Dixon |
22 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeshika Singh |
19 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lewis Ruff |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lewis Ruff |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
29 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Dixon |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
10 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeshika Singh |
9 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lewis Ruff |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
15 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Nov 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-489 |
You can find further information about peer review here.