Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: Conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR)

Original Submission
19 Dec 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund
17 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
18 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 8
18 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
30 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
30 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-94

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page