Peer Review reports
From: The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sandeep Grover |
| 4 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Sampson |
| 18 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gideon Caplan |
| 10 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 25 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 25 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Aug 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Sep 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.