Peer Review reports
From: Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: how to open a Pandora's box
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eleftherios Diamandis |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - remy salmon |
| 9 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - anne Vincent-Salomon |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 16 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gabriella Anderson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 17 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gabriella Anderson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 17 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gabriella Anderson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.