Skip to main content
Download PDF

The prevalence of preterm and low birth weight infants among migrant women in the Pearl River Delta region, China: a population-based birth cohort study

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 1179 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The existing literature evaluating the association between neonatal morbidity and migrant status presents contradictory results. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW) among newborns from local and migrant women in China’s Pearl River Delta (PRD) region.

Methods

In this observational population-based study, we included all live singleton deliveries from PRD region local women and migrant women. Data were sourced from the Guangdong Medical Birth Registry Information System between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2020. Women were categorized into three groups by maternal migrant status: local women from PRD region, migrant women from Guangdong province or from other provinces. The outcome variables that were examined included two adverse birth outcomes: PTB and LBW. The association between the risk of PTB and LBW and maternal migrant status was assessed using logistic regression.

Results

During 2014–2020, 5,219,133 single live deliveries were recorded, corresponding 13.22% to local women and the rest to migrant women coming from Guangdong (53.51%) and other provinces (33.26%). PTB prevalence was highest among local women (5.79%), followed by migrant women from Guangdong (5.29%), and the lowest among migrants from other provinces (4.95%). This association did not change after including maternal age, infant sex, delivery mode, and birth season in the models. Compared to local women, migrant women from other provinces had a lower risk of LBW (4.00% vs. 4.98%, P < 0.001). The prevalence of PTB and LBW was higher among local women than migrants. The odds of delivery PTB and LBW were higher for women who were age ≥ 35. Among the three maternal migration groups, the age-LBW association displayed a typical U-shaped pattern, with those in the youngest (16–24 years) and oldest (≥ 35) age categories exhibiting the higher odds of delivering a LBW neonate. With respect to infant sex, the prevalence of PTB was significantly higher in males than females among the three maternal migration groups. An opposite trend was found for LBW, and the prevalence of LBW was higher in females among the three maternal migration groups.

Conclusion

The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the epidemiology of PTB and LBW among migrant women. Our study suggests that it is the health and robust nature of migrant mothers that predisposes them to better birth outcomes. It is important to recognize that the results of this study, while supportive of the healthy migrant effect, cannot be considered definitive without some exploration of motivation for moving and changes in lifestyle postmigration.

Peer Review reports

Background

With an increasing number of babies born to migrant parents, over the last three or four decades, there has been significant interest in assessing the association between maternal migrant status and birth outcomes. Migrant women frequently initiate the mobility process at a childbearing age, irrespective of individual motivations for leaving their countries [1]. Previous studies have compared perinatal outcomes between local and migrant women with mixed results focusing, like most other studies on the topic worldwide, on preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW). When comparing the risks between local and migrant women of having a PTB, or an LBW infant, some studies gathered evidence suggesting that migrants had more adverse outcomes [2,3,4,5,6] while others found no difference or better outcomes for migrants [7,8,9,10,11].

The existing literature evaluating the association between neonatal morbidity and maternal migrant status presents contradictory results. Migrant status has often been seen as a risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes, such as PTB [3, 5], LBW [4], and perinatal morbidity and mortality [4, 12, 13]. In some instances, migrant groups have equivalent or better outcomes than local women. This is related to what has been called the “healthy migrant effect” or the “epidemiologic paradox” [14], which states only that healthy individuals migrate whereas the individuals at greatest risk stay behind. Most evidence about the healthy migrant effect comes from studies that focused on groups of Latino migrants in the USA [15]. Studies that focus on developing countries are limited with varied results. Some Chinese studies have investigated the “healthy migrant effect” [16]. Tong and Piotrowski found migrants to have better health when compared with the local urban population in Beijing [17]. However, recent research on the health status of Chinese migrants has yielded the opposite results [18].

Since the economic reform in the 1980s, China has experienced decades of rapid urbanization with large-scale rural-to-urban and west-to-east intercity migration [19]. China’s PRD region lies in the central southern coastal part of Guangdong. The PRD region covers nine cities and hosts over 90% of the migrants in Guangdong and accounts for more than 80% of its gross domestic product (GDP) [20, 21]. As one of the largest migrant-concentrated regions in China, the PRD region received approximately 51.99 million rural migrant workers in China [22], providing an opportunity for us to examine birth outcomes among migrant women. In 2021, Tang et al. first measured the effect of migrant status on the likelihood of high-risk pregnancies in China [14]. Estimates of the burden of PTB and LBW in migrant women are needed to understand the epidemiology of this condition because data are sparse and incomplete in China’s PRD region. The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between maternal migrant status and adverse birth outcomes.

Methods

Study design and population

This is a population-based observational study of all live singleton births to local and migrant women using a birth certificate database in the state of the PRD region, between January 1, 2014, and December 31,2020. We accessed data from the Guangdong Women and Children Health Information System. The available information includes region of maternal birth, date of birth, infant gender, gestational age at birth, birth weight, maternal age, and delivery mode. All these data are filled in system by the hospital staff or midwives according to the babies’ medical records, which are also checked by obstetricians. We excluded birth records with missing individual information or incorrect data: (1) births with missing gestational age or gestational age < 20 weeks or > 43 weeks. (2) Births with missing birth weight or birth weight < 500 g or > 5,000 g. We also excluded non-Chinese women or women without a delivery date. After these exclusions, this study included births to migrant women (n = 4,529,040) and local women (n = 690,093) giving birth in the PRD region in the period 2014–2020.

Migrant status

Guided by our literature review and the resident registration system in China [23], we defined a “migrant” as a person who has settled permanently or temporarily in PRD region other than his/her own household registration in China. Women were categorized into the three following groups by maternal migrant status: (1) Local women from PRD region (Group 1): registered in the PRD region and delivered in the PRD region; (2) Migrant women from Guangdong province (Group 2): registered in another region of Guangdong and delivered in the PRD region; (3) Migrant women from other provinces (Group 3): registered in another province and delivered in the PRD region. We then calculated the proportion of PTB and LBW for each maternal migration group.

The PRD region

Guangdong Province, has 21 cities, grouped into four regions according to their geographical location and economic conditions: the PRD, Eastern Guangdong, Western Guangdong, and Northern Guangdong. The PRD region includes Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan, Zhuhai, Zhongshan, Jiangmen, Zhaoqing and Huizhou (Data sources: http://www.gd.gov.cn/).

Outcome variables

Live birth refers to the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of conception, irrespective of the duration of the pregnancy [24]. In accordance with criteria recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), PTB is defined as all births less than 37 whole weeks of gestation or fewer than 259 days since the first day of a woman’s last menstrual period [25], and LBW is a weight at birth that is less than 2500 g (up to and including 2499 g) [26]. The outcome variables of this study were PTB and LBW based on gestational age, PTB can be subdivided as follows: extremely PTB (< 28 completed weeks of gestation), very PTB (28 ≥ to < 32 weeks), or moderately PTB (32 ≥ to < 37 weeks) [27]. Infants with birth weight < 2500 g are further categorized into LBW, 1500–2499 g; very LBW, 1000–1499 g; and extremely LBW < 1000 g [26]. Maternal age at delivery was categorized into three groups: 16–24, 25–29,30–34,35–39, and 40–50 years old.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistical software for Windows (Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Mean gestational age and mean birth weight are expressed as the mean standard deviation (± SD), and categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. The chi-squared test was used for categorical data, and the Student’s t test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare three independent samples. Multivariable logistic regression was used to run crude and adjusted models to assess the association of different immigrant-status mother groups with preterm birth and low-birth-weight. In the adjusted models we included four confounding factors: maternal age, infant sex, delivery mode, and birth season. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval. Probability levels (P value) < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

During 2014–2020, 5,377,162 live births were born in the PRD region, Guangdong. We excluded 958 births with a gestational age less than 28 weeks or higher than 43 weeks, birth weights less than 500 g or higher than 5000 g, and 149,127 multiple births, leaving 5,219,133 births (97.06%) for the final analysis. During the period analyzed 5,219,133 single live deliveries were recorded, corresponding 13.22% to local women and the rest to migrant women coming from Guangdong (53.51%) and other provinces (33.26%).

Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of women who delivered infants in the PRD region between 2014 and 2020 by maternal migrant status. As illustrated in Table 1, the total proportions of mothers aged 16–24, 25–29,30–34,35–39, and 40–50 years old were 20.58%, 37.75%,27.74%,11.38% and 2.45%, respectively. A maternal age of 16–24 years old was frequent for migrant women from other provinces (23.52%), followed by migrant women from Guangdong (20.69%) and local women (12.76%). Migrant women from Guangdong and other provinces were less likely to have a caesarean delivery (30.25% and 34.32%, respectively) than local women (35.15%). There were more births occurring in autumn and summer than in winter and spring among the three maternal groups. Infants of migrant mothers from other provinces had a higher mean gestational age and birth weight than those of local mothers and migrant mothers from Guangdong (all P < 0.001).

Table 1 Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics of migrants and local women giving birth to live singletons between 2014 and 2020 in PRD Region
Full size table

The crude and adjusted associations between maternal migrant status and the risk of PTB and LBW are shown in Table 2. PTB prevalence was highest among local women (5.79%), followed by migrant women from Guangdong (5.29%), and the lowest among migrant women from other provinces (4.95%). This association did not change after including maternal age, infant sex, delivery mode, and birth season in the models. Compared to local women, migrant women from other provinces had a lower risk of LBW (4.00% vs. 4.98%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio was 0.792 (95% CI: 0.781, 0.802). In unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses, migrant women from Guangdong and women from other provinces had significantly lower odds of overall PTBs, extremely PTBs, very PTBs, and moderately PTBs. Similarly, migrant women from other provinces also had lower risk of overall LBW, LBW, very LBW, and extremely LBWs, but not statistically significant in overall LBW, very LBW, and LBW births in the adjusted model (adjusted OR = 1.001 [0.989–1.014], adjusted OR = 0.964 [0.921–1.009], adjusted OR = 1.011 [0.998–1.023], respectively).

Table 2 Crude and adjusted odds ratios with confidence intervals (95%CI) for PTB and LBW births by maternal migrant status
Full size table

Table 3 shows the effect of the maternal migrant status on the rate of PTB and LBW stratified by maternal age, infant sex, and delivery mode. The prevalence of PTB and LBW was higher among local women than migrants in the three maternal age groups. The odds of delivery PTB and LBW were higher for women aged from 40 to 50 among the three maternal migration groups. The highest rates of PTB and LBW were 10.1% and 7.02%, respectively, in the local mothers aged from 40 to 50. Among the three maternal migration groups, the age-LBW association displayed a typical U-shaped pattern, with those in the youngest (16–24 years) and oldest (40–50 years) age categories exhibiting higher odds of delivering an LBW neonate. With respect to infant sex, the prevalence of PTB was significantly higher in males than females among the three maternal migration groups. An opposite trend was found for LBW, and the prevalence of LBW was higher in females among the three maternal migration groups. With PTB or LBW as the outcome, migrant women from Guangdong and other provinces were less likely to receive cesarean compared with those who were born from the PRD region.

Table 3 The effect of the maternal migrant status on the rate of PTB and LBW births stratified by maternal age, infant sex, and delivery mode
Full size table

Discussion

The results of this study involving a large cohort of live births provide a clear description of PTB and LBW discordance between local and migrant women in the PRD region in Guangdong Province. Our study analyzed a total of 5,219,133 single live births to reveal the prevalence of PTB and LBW between local women and migrant women in the PRD region from 2014 to 2020. Our main findings show that, in comparison to local women, migrant women from Guangdong and other provinces have significantly lower odds of PTB and LBW. The present research findings indicated that migrant women had a clearly positive status of birth outcomes. This study reveals the differences in PTB and LBW between local and migrant women in the PRD region, and provides more recent data about the reproductive status of pregnant women in the PRD region.

China has the largest group of rural-to-urban floating women worldwide, most of whom are of childbearing age [28]. As one of the largest migrant-concentrated regions in China, the PRD region provided a good site to examine birth outcomes among migrant women. In southern China, the PRD region had a better economic situation, education conditions and nutritional support than the non-PRD regions [29]. In our study, 86.78% were migrant women over the last seven years. The ratio of migrant women who gave birth in PRD to those local women is approximately 6.5 to 1. This study showed that in general, there are significant differences in the perinatal outcome among local and migrant childbearing women. We found that maternal age over 35 years and cesarean section rates were higher in local women, while the proportion of women aged 16–24 years was significantly higher among migrants, especially the migrant women from other provinces. This may be explained by the predominant type of migration to the PRD region, with migrants being mostly laborers. It is possible to associate the higher maternal age in local patients with the education levels of these women, the time they spent on their education, and whether they had a profession [30].

Previous studies have shown that perinatal outcomes, including PTB and LBW, vary by country within regions. Our study revealed that the rates of PTB and LBW in the PRD region were relatively low, compared with those in other countries worldwide. During the period from 2014 to 2020, the overall PTB rate of 5.24% in the PRD region was at a relatively lower level compared with the global PTB rate ranging from 5% in northern European countries to 18% in African countries [31]. It is also lower than the weighted national incidence of 6.7% in China during 2015–2016 [32]. The rates of LBW in the PRD region (4.62%) were still lower than those of some developed countries, such as the USA (8%), Australia (7%), the UK (8%), Canada (6%) and Japan (8%) [33].

The international literature shows conflicting evidence regarding perinatal outcomes among migrant women compared to the majority population. Some studies have identified migration status as a risk factor [4, 34,35,36]. However, other studies have found that migration is a protective factor regarding perinatal outcomes [9, 37,38,39]. In our study, the birth outcome PTB and LBW rates of migrant women were lower than those of local women. Previous studies comparing migrant and nonmigrant birth outcomes point to a related explanatory hypothesis: the “healthy migrant effect” [40, 41]: women who migrate are particularly healthy on average, and remain so for some time despite socioeconomic disadvantages they face in the host country, thanks in part to strong familial ties. To date, most evidence about the healthy migrant effect on pregnancy outcomes has been collected in studies from the USA; the health disadvantage of migrants or no difference is a more common finding in European countries [15]. Migrant women enjoy health advantages to a certain extent because healthier people are more likely to migrate [42]. We can also theorize that the migrant women are generally in good health, have the economic ability to access health care services and are representative of a healthy self-selected migrant, which could be the true cause of the favorable birth outcomes of these migrants. A “healthy migrant effect” was found and maintained after controlling for various demographic variables. After adjustment, status as migrants were protective in our study. Our study lends support to the “healthy migrant effect”. This suggests that healthy individuals are more likely to migrate than their less-healthy compatriots and that these individuals opt for regions with higher incomes, as in this study. Those mothers who are healthy and able to move, regardless of whether the movement is from one country to another or from one region to another, have healthier babies.

The better outcome of birth weight and LBW outcomes, may be related to these women representing a selected group of migrants. Maternal body composition is one of the most important factors that accounts for geographical variation in neonatal outcomes. The differences in the risk of LBW may be due to differences in genetics or other factors, which were not measured in our study. Overall, people living in northern China had a mean BMI more than 2 kg/m² higher than their counterparts in southern China [43]. Likewise, there was more than a threefold difference in obesity prevalence between northern China and southern China [43]. It has been postulated that nutritional transitions might be at different stages in different parts of China [44]. This is supported by the results of the present study since mothers originating in northern China have a higher BMI than women from southern China and seem more likely to have heavier offspring. Other factors, such as maternal diet, physical activity, illness, and social class, vary across different migrant groups, and these along with genetic mechanisms may explain differences in neonatal outcomes among women of migrant origin and PRD region-born women. As this study found evidence for advantageous birth outcomes birth weight of migrant women, it lends weight to the proposition that the disparities in outcomes between local women and migrant women may be more reflective of the individual characteristics of the women than the sociocultural context of China.

Local women were at higher risk of cesarean delivery compared with migrant women. This result stands in contrast to those reported in other studies in which migrant women were found to have higher rates of cesarean [45, 46]. Suggested protective factors for cesarean delivery included a healthy migrant effect, preference for a vaginal birth, a healthier lifestyle, younger mothers, and the use of fewer interventions during childbirth [46]. Research suggests that pathways leading to cesarean births in migrants are complex, and they are likely to involve a combination of factors related to migrant women’s physical and psychological health, their social and cultural context and the quality of their maternity care [45]. There is insufficient evidence in our study to explain the observed differences.

The results show that mother’s age has a U-shaped relationship with the LBW rate among the three maternal migration groups. The risk of PTB was higher for women aged from 40 to 50 years in all three maternal migration groups and subsequently decreased in the 16–24 year old group and 25–34 year old group. In our study, the prevalence of PTB and LBW increased with maternal age over 35 years. These findings will be beneficial to subsequently explore the causes of differences in fertility in the PRD region. Similarly, the results from the Austrian Register of Births point to a higher rate of PTB in mothers aged 35 and above [47]. In relative terms, mothers of advanced age were more likely to deliver PTB and LBW babies than younger mothers.

Strength and limitations

Our study had several strengths. This study utilized a large population-based data set. The major strengths of this study include the large sample size offering a design with minimal selection bias and the overall high-quality registry data, where almost 87% of parturients are migrants. Even so, 2.9% (n = 158,029) of all deliveries had missing or incorrect information. The study also has some limitations. There were many important factors we did not cover in this study as a limitation of the database. The birth certificate lacks data about maternal biometrics, pre-pregnancy clinical comorbidities, health behavior, utilization of maternity health care, health care insurance and duration of residence for migrant women. The study also lacks data on detailed characteristics of socioeconomic factors, such as household income, work status, or marital/ relationship status, education status which prevents further study of these groups of migrants.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study is one of the few studies based on a large cohort of newborns to understand the relationship between the migration of women and birth outcomes in China. When comparing the perinatal outcome of childbearing migrants and local women, a more favorable profile was observed among migrants. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the epidemiology of PTB and LBW among migrants. Our study suggests that it is the health and robust nature of migrant mothers that predisposes them to better birth outcomes. Further studies are needed to more deeply explore issues related to migration history and more detailed characteristics of the socioeconomic factors of mothers.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

PRD:

China’s Pearl River Delta Region

PTB:

preterm birth

LBW:

low birth weight

References

  1. Almeida LM, Caldas J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Salcedo-Barrientos D, Dias S. Maternal healthcare in migrants: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pedersen GS, Mortensen LH, Gerster M, Rich-Edwards J, Andersen AM. Preterm birth and birthweight-for-gestational age among immigrant women in Denmark 1978–2007: a nationwide registry study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(6):534–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sosta E, Tomasoni LR, Frusca T, Triglia M, Pirali F, El Hamad I, Castelli F. Preterm delivery risk in migrants in Italy: an observational prospective study. J Travel Med. 2008;15(4):243–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollini P, Pampallona S, Wanner P, Kupelnick B. Pregnancy outcome of migrant women and integration policy: a systematic review of the international literature. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(3):452–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wanigaratne S, Cole DC, Bassil K, Hyman I, Moineddin R, Urquia ML. The influence of refugee status and secondary migration on preterm birth. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2016;70(6):622–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernández MA, Cavanillas AB, de Mateo S. Differences in the reproductive pattern and low birthweight by maternal country of origin in Spain, 1996–2006. Eur J Pub Health. 2011;21(1):104–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El Reda DK, Grigorescu V, Posner SF, Davis-Harrier A. Lower rates of preterm birth in women of arab ancestry: an epidemiologic paradox–Michigan, 1993–2002. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(6):622–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Acevedo-Garcia D, Soobader MJ, Berkman LF. Low birthweight among US Hispanic/Latino subgroups: the effect of maternal foreign-born status and education. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(12):2503–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Janevic T, Savitz DA, Janevic M. Maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among immigrant women to the United States from Eastern Europe: a test of the healthy migrant hypothesis. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(3):429–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiao LW, Chiang TL. Adverse birth outcomes among native-born and foreign-born mothers in Taiwan: a population-based birth cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. See LC, Shen YM, Lin SR. Lower early neonatal mortality among singletons in transnational marriage families: Taiwan Birth Registry. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(7):483–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vik ES, Aasheim V, Schytt E, Small R, Moster D, Nilsen RM. Stillbirth in relation to maternal country of birth and other migration related factors: a population-based study in Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, Khong TY, Silver RM, Smith GCS, Boyle FM, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet (London England). 2016;387(10019):691–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang D, Gao X, Coyte PC. The relationship between internal migration and the likelihood of high-risk pregnancy: Hukou system and high-risk pregnancies in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Štípková M. Immigrant disadvantage or the healthy immigrant effect? Evidence about low birth weight differences in the Czech Republic. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;26(4):662–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen J. Internal migration and health: re-examining the healthy migrant phenomenon in China. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(8):1294–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piotrowski TM. Migration and Health Selectivity in the Context of Internal Migration in China, 1997–2009. Population Research&Policy Review; 2012.

  18. Zhang L, Liu S, Zhang G, Wu S. Internal migration and the health of the returned population: a nationally representative study of China. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gong P, Liang S, Carlton EJ, Jiang Q, Wu J, Wang L, Remais JV. Urbanisation and health in China. Lancet (London England). 2012;379(9818):843–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fabre G, Rodwin VG. Public health and medical care for the world’s factory: China’s Pearl River Delta Region. BMC Med. 2011;9:110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zou G, Zeng Z, Chen W, Ling L. Self-reported illnesses and service utilisation among migrants working in small-to medium sized enterprises in Guangdong, China. Public Health. 2015;129(7):970–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guan M. Should the poor have no medicines to cure? A study on the association between social class and social security among the rural migrant workers in urban China. Int J Equity Health 2017, 16.

  23. Mou J, Griffiths SM, Fong HF, Dawes MG. Defining migration and its health impact in China. Public Health. 2015;129(10):1326–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu H, Dai Q, Xu Y, Gong Z, Dai G, Ding M, Duggan C, Hu Z, Hu FB. Time trends and risk factor associated with premature birth and infants deaths due to prematurity in Hubei Province, China from 2001 to 2012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:329.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng K, Liang J, Mu Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Li M, Li X, Dai L, Li Q, Chen P, et al. Preterm births in China between 2012 and 2018: an observational study of more than 9 million women. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(9):e1226–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marete I, Ekhaguere O, Bann CM, Bucher SL, Nyongesa P, Patel AB, Hibberd PL, Saleem S, Goldenberg RL, Goudar SS, et al. Regional trends in birth weight in low- and middle-income countries 2013–2018. Reproductive Health. 2020;17(Suppl 3):176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma R, Luo Y, Wang J, Zhou Y, Sun H, Ren X, Xu Q, Zhang L, Zou L. Ten-year time trends in preterm birth during a sociodemographic transition period: a retrospective cohort study in Shenzhen, China. BMJ open. 2020;10(10):e037266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu J, Ye Z, Fang Q, Huang L, Zheng X. Surveillance of parenting outcomes, Mental Health and Social Support for Primiparous Women among the rural-to-Urban floating Population. Healthc (Basel Switzerland) 2021, 9(11).

  29. Miao H, Li B, Li W, Yao F, Chen Y, Chen R, Lin J, Wu Y, Guo P, Zhao Q. Adverse birth outcomes in Guangdong province, China, 2014–2017: a spatiotemporal analysis of 2.9 million births. BMJ open. 2019;9(11):e030629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Col Madendag I, Eraslan Sahin M, Madendag Y, Sahin E, Demir MB, Ozdemir F, Acmaz G, Muderris II. The Effect of Immigration on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Analysis of Experiences at a Turkish Tertiary Hospital. BioMed research international 2019, 2019:2326797.

  31. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB, Kinney M, Lawn J. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reproductive Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen C, Zhang JW, Xia HW, Zhang HX, Betran AP, Zhang L, Hua XL, Feng LP, Chen D, Sun K, et al. Preterm Birth in China between 2015 and 2016. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(11):1597–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Y, Wu L, Zhang W, Zou L, Li G, Fan L. Delivery modes and pregnancy outcomes of low birth weight infants in China. J Perinatology: Official J Calif Perinat Association. 2016;36(1):41–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zeitlin J, Blondel B, Ananth CV. Characteristics of childbearing women, obstetrical interventions and preterm delivery: a comparison of the US and France. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(5):1107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Urquia ML, Glazier RH, Blondel B, Zeitlin J, Gissler M, Macfarlane A, Ng E, Heaman M, Stray-Pedersen B, Gagnon AJ. International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2010;64(3):243–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khanolkar AR, Wedrén S, Essén B, Sparén P, Koupil I. Preterm and postterm birth in immigrant- and Swedish-born parents: a population register-based study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(5):435–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gissler M, Alexander S, MacFarlane A, Small R, Stray-Pedersen B, Zeitlin J, Zimbeck M, Gagnon A. Stillbirths and infant deaths among migrants in industrialized countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):134–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hessol NA, Fuentes-Afflick E. The impact of migration on pregnancy outcomes among mexican-origin women. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(3):377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Racape J, Schoenborn C, Sow M, Alexander S, De Spiegelaere M. Are all immigrant mothers really at risk of low birth weight and perinatal mortality? The crucial role of socio-economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Simó C, Méndez S. Testing the effect of the epidemiologic paradox: birth weight of newborns of immigrant and non-immigrant mothers in the region of Valencia, Spain. J Biosoc Sci. 2014;46(5):635–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Walsh J, Mahony R, Armstrong F, Ryan G, O’Herlihy C, Foley M. Ethnic variation between white European women in labour outcomes in a setting in which the management of labour is standardised-a healthy migrant effect? BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):713–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tang D, Gao X, Rebeira M, Coyte PC. Effects of Migration on infant and maternal health in China. Inquiry: J Med care Organ Provis Financing. 2019;56:46958019884189.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang L, Zhou B, Zhao Z, Yang L, Zhang M, Jiang Y, Li Y, Zhou M, Wang L, Huang Z, et al. Body-mass index and obesity in urban and rural China: findings from consecutive nationally representative surveys during 2004-18. Lancet (London England). 2021;398(10294):53–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou M, Feng X, Yong J, Li Y, Zhang M, Page A, Astell-Burt T, Zhao W. Lifting the lid on geographic complexity in the relationship between body mass index and education in China. Health Place. 2017;46:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Merry L, Vangen S, Small R. Caesarean births among migrant women in high-income countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;32:88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Merry L, Small R, Blondel B, Gagnon AJ. International migration and caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schildberger B, Linzner D, Hehenberger L, Leitner H, Pfeifer C. Influence of maternal age on selected obstetric parameters. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019;79(11):1208–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lulu Xie and Zhijiang Liang contributed equally, and share first authorship in this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511442, China

    Lulu Xie & Xianqiong Luo

  2. Department of Public Health, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511442, China

    Zhijiang Liang

  3. Department of Health Care, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511442, China

    Xionghu Wang

Authors
  1. Lulu Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhijiang Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xionghu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xianqiong Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LL.X contributed to the research idea, study design, and writing of the manuscript. ZJ.L was responsible for the study design, statistical analyses, interpretation of result, and manuscript preparation. XH.W helped with data collection, data curation and validation. XQ.L was responsible for conducting the study and participated in the conception, critical revision and approval of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianqiong Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong, China. The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee review board of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, because only routine birth data in the birth registry system were used and the patients/the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of our research. All data were anonymized.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research. Patient consent for publication Not required.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, L., Liang, Z., Wang, X. et al. The prevalence of preterm and low birth weight infants among migrant women in the Pearl River Delta region, China: a population-based birth cohort study. BMC Public Health 24, 1179 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-024-18667-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-024-18667-8

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us